Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:02
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
When a narcissist mad at their new supply, do they take it out on the old supply?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What was your biggest culture shock going to Europe?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Atque sapiente quis aspernatur.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Roberts: Chance Of Ohtani Pitching Before All-Star Break Is "North Of Zero" - MLB Trade Rumors
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Meteor Activity Outlook for June 7-13, 2025 - American Meteor Society
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Opal Suchata Chuangsri from Thailand crowned Miss World 2025 - CNN
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.